Teams

RIO DEL ORO CM7.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesJosiah Catalan / Tony Karren vs Alex Bychkoviak / Daniel Balabanovich4-6, 2-6
2024-10-14vs SUTTER LAWN CM7.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesJosiah Catalan / Brian Katz vs Michael Conway / Oscar Watson6-7, 5-7
2024-08-29vs ED MITCHELL PK CM7.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesJosiah Catalan / Tony Karren vs Vedesh Babu / Elangovan Rajendran6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Chris Mundhenk
published 4.5
3.92
Billy Krimmel
published 4
3.87
Matt Mentch
published
3.82
Tony Karren
published
3.82
Patrick Dorais
published
3.81
Ryan Renteria
published
3.80
Rick Ray
published
3.80
Rob Lessler
published
3.78
Josiah Catalan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Carson Dorais
published 4
3.73
Andre Bugawan
published 4
3.70
John Pruett
published
3.46
Brian Katz
published 3.5
3.44
Dan Lowe
published 3.5
3.44
Mark Silva
published
3.40
Greg Cho
published 3.5
3.30
Rommel Llanes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Renteria + Rob Lessler3259% games−2.4% vs expected
Patrick Dorais + Ryan Renteria4149% games−3.7% vs expected
Rommel Llanes + Mark Silva224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Mundhenk
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Billy Krimmel
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
Matt Mentch
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
Tony Karren
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.82
Patrick Dorais
28W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
Ryan Renteria
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Rick Ray
15W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Rob Lessler
30W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Josiah Catalan
21W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Carson Dorais
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andre Bugawan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
John Pruett
0W–11L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.70
3.5
Brian Katz
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Dan Lowe
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Mark Silva
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Greg Cho
34W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Rommel Llanes
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.