Teams

GEPTA/55&over/6.0M/Andalis/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.89 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Ernesto Landeros
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3
2.80
James Lambeth
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.78
Charles Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Alberto Batalla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donald Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.69
Edward Sosa
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.66
Craig Fortune
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.32
Hector Montelongo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Collins Preston
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 2.5
Jorge Coreano
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Jose Andalis
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Ken O'Neal
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Kevin Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Manouchehr Refaeian
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alberto Batalla + Jorge Coreano8364% games+12.6% vs expected
Jose Andalis + Edward Sosa9557% games+3.6% vs expected
Kevin Woodson + Jorge Coreano9652% gamesnot enough data
Craig Fortune + Edward Sosa4645% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Kevin Woodson3353% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Jorge Coreano4256% gamesnot enough data
Alberto Batalla + Jose Andalis1426% gamesnot enough data
Alberto Batalla + Edward Sosa134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ernesto Landeros
16W–3L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
James Lambeth
108W–107L career · 45 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Charles Stephens
40W–54L career · 17 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Alberto Batalla
51W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Donald Rhodes
27W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Edward Sosa
57W–77L career · 26 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Craig Fortune
25W–62L career · 20 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
2.5
Hector Montelongo
11W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Collins Preston
18W–71L career · 25 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
Jorge Coreano
64W–75L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Andalis
37W–51L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken O'Neal
11W–45L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Woodson
84W–67L career · 50 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manouchehr Refaeian
109W–95L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.