Teams

Apex:NetAssets:Doyle

2024 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 55 & Over Women South

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-02vs Apex:PointTaken:BowringWon 20
W#2 DoublesPamela Elwell / Jill Craft vs Karen Fendler / Patricia Martel-Buxton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Rentz / Marsha Traill vs Ruth Crosby / Dana DeFilippo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-12-02vs Apex:Swagger:SteinmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Love / Pamela Elwell vs Christiane Villedrouin / Anne Geissinger1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Craft / Laurie Burger vs Shelley Goodrich / Linda Iselborn2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Doyle / Charlotte Pease vs Carol Epstein / Martha Elbaum2-6, 2-6
2023-11-12vs Apex:Swagger:SteinmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Romer / Kathy Brown vs Moira Simonds / Linda Iselborn7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Love / Jill Craft vs Carol Epstein / Mary Becker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Pamela Elwell vs Julie Wooden / Julie Sheehan6-2, 7-6
2023-11-12vs Apex:PointTaken:BowringWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Sargent / Anna Romer vs Sue Strasenburgh / Patricia Martel-Buxton6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPamela Elwell / Diana Doyle vs Barbara Cassidy / Heather Krausse5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Matt / Heidi Rentz vs Carol Lambert / Andrea Otis-Higgins6-3, 6-4
2023-10-28vs Apex:Swagger:SteinmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Brown / Pamela Elwell vs Shelley Goodrich / Martha Elbaum6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Craft / Laurie Burger vs Diane Mathieu / Christiane Villedrouin0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Rentz / Ruth Matt vs Lori Thayer / Moira Simonds1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-15vs Apex:PointTaken:BowringLost 03
L#1 DoublesPauline Smith / Marsha Traill vs Anne Vaillancourt / Heather Krausse1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlotte Pease / Christine Rothman vs Carol Lambert / Karen Fendler1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJill Craft / Laurie Burger vs Dana DeFilippo / Andrea Otis-Higgins3-6, 4-6
2023-09-30vs Apex:PointTaken:BowringLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiana Doyle / Charlotte Pease vs Heather Krausse / Jennifer Bowring2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Elwell / Christine Rothman vs Karen Fendler / Carol Lambert1-6, 4-6
2023-09-30vs Apex:Swagger:SteinmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Doyle / Julie Sargent vs Annie Houston / Marion Bannon1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChristine Rothman / Pamela Elwell vs Diane Mathieu / Lori Thayer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 55 & Over Women South have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.25
Heidi Rentz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Julie Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Pamela Elwell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.08
Ruth Matt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Diana Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.01
Jill Craft
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Rebecca Love
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Charlotte Pease
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Marsha Traill
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Anna Romer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Christine Rothman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Brown
published
Kathy Brown
published
Laurie Burger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Pauline Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Doyle + Charlotte Pease41341% games−0.8% vs expected
Ruth Matt + Heidi Rentz4545% games−1.1% vs expected
Diana Doyle + Jill Craft11531% games−3.4% vs expected
Diana Doyle + Julie Sargent71144% games−5.6% vs expected
Diana Doyle + Heidi Rentz0612% games−14.5% vs expected
Heidi Rentz + Jill Craft2740% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Burger + Jill Craft2637% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Love + Jill Craft1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Rentz
24W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
Julie Sargent
25W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
Pamela Elwell
73W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Ruth Matt
51W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Doyle
79W–151L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
Jill Craft
19W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Rebecca Love
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Charlotte Pease
35W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Marsha Traill
40W–86L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Anna Romer
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Christine Rothman
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Brown
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Brown
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Burger
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pauline Smith
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.