Teams

Meadows Purple YaYas

2026 Sarasota Social 70 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Wednesday

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-18vs Royal PaynesLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesLinda Hosmer / Karen Matthews vs Dian Cuellar / Trinh Harmon3-6, 5-7
L#3 Female DoublesConnie Brown / Christa Ruppert vs Mari Koerner / Joan Eisenberg2-6, 1-6
2026-03-11vs Courtside FeldmeierLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesKaren Matthews / Susan Gillis vs Suzanne Brosnan / Debbie Phillips3-6, 1-6
W#2 Female DoublesCatherine Hawkins / Terri Costa vs Darlene Newman / Sandi Gayheart6-1, 6-2
L#3 Female DoublesJulie Harris / Gail Hadley vs Sally Pym / Mary Lou Irish2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-04vs GT Bray SocialitesWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesSusan Gillis / Terri Costa vs Ardeth Black / Laraine Martin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesCatherine Hynes / Karen Matthews vs Jean Lacroix / Barbara Komarin6-1, 6-2
2026-02-25vs Payne Park Hall 70Lost 12
W#1 Female DoublesAlice Levine / Linda Hosmer vs Mona Harrington / Linda Kretlow6-2, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesTerri Costa / Karen Matthews vs Joyce Ottinger / Sigi Moriece1-6, 1-6
L#3 Female DoublesGail Hadley / Harlean Satin vs Beverly Austgen / Taffy Anderson2-6, 3-6
2026-02-18vs IslandWalk Turner 70Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Hosmer / Alice Levine vs Nancy Dickson / Patricia Gregory7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesKaren Matthews / Terri Costa vs Mae Rose / Jill Sneider2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-11vs Royal PaynesLost 12
W#1 Female DoublesCatherine Hawkins / Karen Matthews vs Joan Cadd / Melinda Belter6-2, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesChrista Ruppert / Becky Pomfret vs Joan Eisenberg / Dian Cuellar2-6, 2-6
L#3 Female DoublesHarlean Satin / Connie Brown vs Joan Hazen / Mari Koerner2-6, 3-6
2026-02-04vs Courtside FeldmeierWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesAlice Levine / Linda Hosmer vs Suzanne Brosnan / Sally Pym6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesTerri Costa / Susan Gillis vs Sandi Gayheart / Mary Lou Irish6-2, 6-1
2026-01-28vs GT Bray SocialitesWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesLinda Hosmer / Alice Levine vs Faye Long / Peggy Hite6-3, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesTerri Costa / Karen Matthews vs Ardeth Black / Lynn Taylor7-5, 6-3
2026-01-21vs Payne Park Hall 70Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAlice Levine / Karen Matthews vs Janet Hepner / Linda Kretlow2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesCatherine Hynes / Christa Ruppert vs Joyce Ottinger / JoMarie Privitera0-6, 0-6
2026-01-14vs IslandWalk Turner 70Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAlice Levine / Susan Gillis vs Linda Sleet / Patricia Gregory0-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesCatherine Hawkins / Terri Costa vs Trish Connolly / Mae Rose5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Alice Levine
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Hynes
published 3.5
3.16
Catherine Hawkins
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.80
Christa Ruppert
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Becky Pomfret
published 3
Gail Hadley
published
Harlean Satin
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published
Julie Harris
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published
Karen Matthews
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published
Linda Hosmer
published
Susan Gillis
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published
Terri Costa
usually #2 Female Doubles 86%, also #1 Female Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Costa + Karen Matthews7452% gamesnot enough data
Karen Matthews + Susan Gillis134 matchesnot enough data
Becky Pomfret + Catherine Hynes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alice Levine
44W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Catherine Hynes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Hawkins
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Christa Ruppert
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Becky Pomfret
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Gail Hadley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Harlean Satin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Harris
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Karen Matthews
53W–67L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Hosmer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Gillis
95W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terri Costa
11W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.