Teams

CCTA70/Crouse/Sun City

2022 SC 70 & Over · Adult Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Martha Widgen
published
Ann Marsteller
published 3
Debi Black
published 3
Ellen Crouse
published 3
2.71
Ellen Hart
published 3
2.69
June Burns
published
2.46
Jill Mosse
published
Jane Koncicki
published
Jean Harris
published
Kay Lowell
published
Marta Yelverton
published
Mary Sampieri
published
Patsy Sublett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Mosse + Carolyn Montalbano2450% gamesnot enough data
June Burns + Ellen Hart134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Sampieri + Patsy Sublett224 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Hart + Jean Harris224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Widgen
40W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Ann Marsteller
8W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carolyn Montalbano
3W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Debi Black
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ellen Crouse
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Ellen Hart
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
June Burns
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Jill Mosse
10W–27L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jane Koncicki
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean Harris
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kay Lowell
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marta Yelverton
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Sampieri
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patsy Sublett
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.