Teams

Buckhorn Fireballs - M. Eiermann

2023 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Nicole Kipp vs Barbara Dolan / Kathleen Gafarian0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGiselle Miller / Carol Guido vs Sharon Woodruff / Cissy Barr6-0, 6-1
2023-08-11vs HILLS/Kuntz/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Krissy Heybroek vs Lisa Polk / Kathryn Stallings6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Monica Eiermann vs Brittney Herron / Ashley Gagne3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-04vs Avila Strikers - G. MorganWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Deb Spears vs Joann Abraham / Kimberly Troyer6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGiselle Miller / Carol Guido vs Yeon Thomas / Anne Stafford3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Wolczak / Sara Newsom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-28vs Buckhorn Babes - N. EvansSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Deb Spears vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Maria Karina Espinoza / Christina Sullivan2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Arielle Flynn vs Xue Chan / Debbie Beckwith3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGiselle Miller / Carol Guido vs Anne McKenna / Carmen Heggen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesArielle Flynn / Mary Flynn vs Helene Kennedy-Peterson / Kathleen Gafarian7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Tammy Hohman vs Julie Faulkner / Karen Johnson6-0, 6-2
2023-07-07vs HILLS/Kuntz/Trilevel3.5/3.0/2.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesKrissy Heybroek / Nicole Kipp vs Andrea Cottrell / Lisa Polk6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Brittney Herron / Lacy Gregory4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Collier / Sara Newsom vs Jenna Melasi / Kristin Nail3-6, 3-6
2023-06-30vs Avila Strikers - G. MorganWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Deb Spears vs Kimberly Troyer / Joann Abraham6-3, 6-1
2023-06-23vs Buckhorn Babes - N. EvansLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Kipp / Deb Spears vs Dena Linthicum / Meredith Vasey6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Tammy Hohman vs Erin Posey / Natalya Burlakova5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Wolczak / Sara Newsom vs Renee Rasmussen / Silvia Cuevas4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-16vs Tampa Palm Wild Cards - A. McKennaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Arielle Flynn vs Xue Chan / Eileen de Perello2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Eiermann / Carol Guido vs Wei Xue / Jihea Helme6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Deb Spears
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Arielle Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Nicole Kipp
published
3.48
Krissy Heybroek
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.36
Tina Warmbier
published
3.17
Carol Guido
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Mary Flynn
published
3.13
Tammy Hohman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Collier
published
2.92
Melissa Wolczak
published
2.91
Laurie Harrar
published
2.74
Sara Newsom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Giselle Miller
published 3
Monica Eiermann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krissy Heybroek + Deb Spears21859% games+12.3% vs expected
Deb Spears + Carol Guido13854% games+10.5% vs expected
Nicole Kipp + Krissy Heybroek4167% games+9.8% vs expected
Tammy Hohman + Carol Guido3654% games+5.7% vs expected
Tammy Hohman + Deb Spears224 matchesnot enough data
Krissy Heybroek + Carol Guido314 matchesnot enough data
Carol Guido + Tina Warmbier224 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Hohman + Krissy Heybroek303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deb Spears
231W–146L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Arielle Flynn
93W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
Nicole Kipp
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Krissy Heybroek
212W–103L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Tina Warmbier
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–216L career · 10 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Tammy Hohman
77W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Collier
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Melissa Wolczak
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Laurie Harrar
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Giselle Miller
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Monica Eiermann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.