Teams

SD LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Stacy

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-18vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ EdwardsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Grace Daly vs Amy Rorstad / Dianne Golingan2-6, 2-6
2023-06-04vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ La CrueWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Shirley Park vs Elizabeth Estevane / Carrie Ridge6-2, 7-5
2023-04-30vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ La CrueWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Nguyen / Michelle VANN vs Marisa Alvarado / Megumi Bolger7-5, 6-0
2023-04-23vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Sahd / Michelle VANN vs Melinda Meader / Michelle Adams6-1, 7-6
2023-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Axmann / Kristin Montgomery vs Monica Farmar / Greta Sybert6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kristine Nguyen
published
3.44
Julie Wood
published
3.35
Lisa Carey
published
3.32
Christine Pham
published 3.5
3.31
Michelle VANN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Kristin Montgomery
published
3.23
Karen Sahd
published 3.5
3.10
Shirley Park
published
3.06
Jo Ann Stewart
published
2.73
Grace Daly
published 3
2.71
Elayne Berman
published 3
2.66
Laura Stacy
published
2.63
Karen Axmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Carey + Kristin Montgomery4251% games+1.0% vs expected
Elayne Berman + Karen Axmann2434% gamesnot enough data
Karen Sahd + Kristin Montgomery213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Julie Wood
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lisa Carey
25W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Christine Pham
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Michelle VANN
67W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Kristin Montgomery
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Sahd
52W–66L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Shirley Park
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jo Ann Stewart
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Grace Daly
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elayne Berman
70W–62L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.