Teams

AStover/MLeisure (Blakeney)

2023 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesAlyson Vaughan vs Anne Schmitt6-3, 6-2
2023-07-19vs TAmos/VSofarelli (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRachel Grantham vs Phyllis Waud6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSridevi Ganesan vs Martha Lowman6-1, 6-4
2023-07-12vs VTolson (Firethorne)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRachel Grantham vs Julianne Gray6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesVirginia Katzen vs Jennifer Pollino6-4, 6-2
2023-06-28vs KCurley (Raintree)Split 11
W#1 SinglesRachel Grantham vs Kimberlee Curley6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSridevi Ganesan vs Suzanne Austin2-6, 4-6
2023-06-14vs KMacrone (BCC)Won 10
W#2 SinglesAlyson Vaughan vs Kate MacRone6-0, 6-0
2023-06-07vs KDay (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRachel Grantham vs Jimena Lozano de Bermudez6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAlyson Vaughan vs Kristen Day6-1, 6-2
2023-05-31vs TAmos/VSofarelli (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 SinglesVirginia Katzen vs Rhonda Tate7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Rachel Grantham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Tanya Easter-Ranftl
published
3.22
Alyson Vaughan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Wendy Rossi
published
3.13
Virginia Katzen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Sridevi Ganesan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.50
Shikha Agrawal
published
Melissa Leisure
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Grantham + Virginia Katzen5062% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Grantham + Sridevi Ganesan314 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Katzen + Sridevi Ganesan123 matchesnot enough data
Alyson Vaughan + Sridevi Ganesan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Grantham
159W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.58
Tanya Easter-Ranftl
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anita Stewart-Stover
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alyson Vaughan
39W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Wendy Rossi
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Virginia Katzen
61W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Sridevi Ganesan
62W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Shikha Agrawal
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Melissa Leisure
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.