← Teams

PTC-LaMontagne

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Julie LaMontagne
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.87
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-30Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesLaurel Hallock Koppelman vs Jinquan Wu6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Barbara Maughan vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Gail Toft-Vizzini4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Michiyo Nozaki4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-06-23Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Barbara Maughan vs Robin Burak / Trish Carder6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Leah Black6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaryn Peters / Kathleen Crowley vs Teresa Darling / Virginia Martinez6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLaurel Hallock Koppelman vs Annie Tran5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-10Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Kathy Cook6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Catherine Greenblatt vs Jane King Ayers / Robin Nielsen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLaurel Hallock Koppelman vs Tina Prassas6-3, 6-2
2019-06-08Lost 0–4
L#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Jennifer Potter6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Barbara Maughan vs Hildie Oliver / Michelle Cole6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Sibyl Jarrett6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Natalie Candrian Bell / Rita Pearson6-4, 6-2
2019-05-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Barbara Maughan vs Jeri Finn / Andrea Lamprecht7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Sara Crate6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Holly Lekas / Sarah Anderson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2019-05-05Won 4–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Maughan / Catherine Greenblatt vs Cassia Carpio / Kerri Pinelli6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesColleen Walker vs Susan Robblee7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaryn Peters / Katja Daoud vs Diana Crawford / Susan Elmer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Rashmi Nath6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Virginia Welch vs Anshu Ahluwalia / Zhuoyun Zhou7-5, 6-4
2019-04-26Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesBarbara Maughan / Catherine Greenblatt vs Amy Thomas / Lisa McBee6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Lana Finley6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesColleen Walker vs Kerri Patrick4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Barbara Lolich vs Sharon Place / Sharon Patricelli6-1, 6-2
2019-04-20Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Jean Jensen / Lisa Howlett6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCatherine Greenblatt vs Gina Condon6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Kaja Taft vs Debbie Ackroyd / Kathy Haugh6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Melanie Morris3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%88%12%
2.95
3
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
74W–75L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.