Teams

GPawlush (Weddington)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-29vs MBoyce/HGuerouani (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMartin Iles / Randy Barrett vs Saurabh Tyagi / Matt Allen6-2, 6-1
2022-09-01vs DTyson (Life Time)Won 20
W#2 DoublesRandy Barrett / Patrick Murchison vs David Tyson / Jihun Moon7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMartin Iles / BART AUSTIN vs Biju Nair / Zhen Zu6-2, 6-3
2022-08-25vs PKartes (Mountainbrook)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Murchison / Randy Barrett vs Rudy Bombien / John Rasberry4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-11vs KFox (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBART AUSTIN / Martin Iles vs John Robinson / Benjamin Bergeson7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
BART AUSTIN
published 4
3.79
Kevin Conway
published
3.77
Brett Diller
published 4
3.73
Jamie Wolf
published 4
3.73
Scott Waldrop
published
3.70
Martin Iles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Randy Barrett
published
3.67
George Pawlush
published 4
3.64
Patrick Murchison
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Aaron Bouronich
published
Kevin Warren
published
Steven Eagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

BART AUSTIN + Jamie Wolf6361% games+6.7% vs expected
Martin Iles + Kevin Conway3246% games−5.3% vs expected
Patrick Murchison + George Pawlush9857% games−5.3% vs expected
Kevin Conway + George Pawlush2344% games−5.4% vs expected
Patrick Murchison + Martin Iles4357% gamesnot enough data
Brett Diller + Martin Iles224 matchesnot enough data
BART AUSTIN + George Pawlush224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
BART AUSTIN
32W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Kevin Conway
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Brett Diller
63W–59L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jamie Wolf
34W–20L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Scott Waldrop
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Martin Iles
162W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Randy Barrett
13W–28L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
George Pawlush
67W–64L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Patrick Murchison
55W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Aaron Bouronich
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Warren
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Eagan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.