Teams

TCRC Young's RAC

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-30vs Westwood LeftwichWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Sheehan / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Brian Holder / James Mullahy6-2, 6-2
2023-10-26vs SCC StembridgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Sheehan / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Charles Means / Jay Honse7-5, 6-1
2023-10-17vs ACAC Delisio / SebeticWon 10
W#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Matthew Sheehan vs John Delisio / Jesse Smith6-4, 6-1
2023-10-10vs Belmont GauthierWon 10
W#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Matthew Sheehan vs Jesse Gauthier / Chuck Wandling6-2, 6-2
2023-09-12vs MAC Snow (4.5)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDon Ha / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Erich Yost / Kevin Cousins4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jeremy Theisen
published
3.75
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.71
Matthew Sheehan
published
3.61
Tim Parks
published
3.10
Don Ha
published
2.89
Pete van Valkenburg
published
2.85
Julius Anongos
published
2.71
Don Bruce
published
Ken Lu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julius Anongos + Pete van Valkenburg3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Theisen
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Sheehan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Tim Parks
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Don Ha
15W–30L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Pete van Valkenburg
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Julius Anongos
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Don Bruce
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Ken Lu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.