Teams

Team 5 Love N Racquets

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-02-26vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 SinglesElissa Lei vs Dana Chladek6-2, 6-0
2023-02-19vs Team 4 Set 2 WinWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Millson Anderson / Supavinee Hereford vs Vanessa Ogilvie / Sohee Chu7-6, 4-1
2023-02-12vs Team 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesReese Scott / Elissa Lei vs Danielle Desfosses / Valerie Henderson2-6, 1-6
2023-01-29vs Team 3Split 11
W#1 DoublesKim Miller / Elissa Lei vs Natalie Eatedali / Laurie Cohen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Millson Anderson / Ingrid Teasdale vs Janet Szamosszegi / Trinh Banks0-6, 0-6
2023-01-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesElissa Lei vs Lida Beninson7-5, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

CJ Lin
published 4.5
4.16
Monika Hooper
published
4.06
Elissa Lei
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Elizabeth Millson Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Lauren Vitello
published
3.96
Aileen Jones
published 4
3.90
Kim Miller
published
3.71
Jennifer Hunter
published
Kecia Brown
published
Kelly Bohne
published
Reese Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reese Scott + Lauren Vitello6359% games+2.4% vs expected
Kim Miller + Aileen Jones3349% games−3.7% vs expected
Elissa Lei + Aileen Jones224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
CJ Lin
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monika Hooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Elissa Lei
136W–205L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Elizabeth Millson Anderson
54W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
Lauren Vitello
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Aileen Jones
48W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Lu Ann Rubenstein
69W–47L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Jennifer Hunter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kecia Brown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Bohne
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Reese Scott
18W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.