Teams

WHRC-Jennings

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.59 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jianxun Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Tochukwu George
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Emily Qi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Cara Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Richard Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Richard Press
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Thor Deacon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Yanchen Qi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Tracey Hodgson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Xia Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-11-20Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTochukwu George / Tracey Hodgson vs Ellen Pearson / Sam Lumetta6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesYanchen Qi / Richard Press vs Gina Meyer / Dan Tracy6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesXia Yuan / Jianxun Zhang vs Ruth Semon / Albert Hensley7-5, 7-5
2021-10-24Lost 03
L#1 DoublesThor Deacon / Cara Williams vs Kim Tellin / Bryan Gonzalvo6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Ellen Hodges / Arjun Bilakanti6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRichard Jennings / Yanchen Qi vs Dottie Quinn Jacobs / Donny Cablao6-0, 6-2
2021-10-17Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTochukwu George / Yu Zhang vs Anna Reutin / Kenya Reutin6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYanchen Qi / Richard Press vs Jennifer Tran / Alex Ton6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard Jennings / Tracey Hodgson vs Elizabeth Phan / Brian Hughes6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-10Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Jennings / Cara Williams vs Alex McIntosh / Gabriela McIntosh5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJianxun Zhang / Xia Yuan vs Huy Bui / Carly Vendegna6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTony Humpage / Emily Qi vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Parish Burns6-2, 6-2
2021-10-03Lost 12
L#1 DoublesXia Yuan / Jianxun Zhang vs Kiersten Lake / Mike Booth6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYanchen Qi / Tochukwu George vs Andrea Findley / Jeffrey Fuchs6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Robyn Hilden / Mike Baker6-2, 6-4
2021-09-27Won 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Qi / Tony Humpage vs Susan Suttich / David Hoiland6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYu Zhang / Jianxun Zhang vs Rita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCara Williams / Richard Jennings vs Alena Lauritsen / Ben Lauritsen7-6, 7-5
2021-09-19Lost 03
L#1 DoublesYanchen Qi / Thor Deacon vs Sarah Kaufman / Josh Belzman6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYu Zhang / Richard Jennings vs Vicki Blunt / Mark Muckerheide4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesXia Yuan / Jianxun Zhang vs Cheryl Geisler / Barrry Weyhrauch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jianxun Zhang
59W–43L career
1%98%1%
3.77
4
Tochukwu George
29W–46L career · type A
50%50%0%
3.44
3.5
Emily Qi
87W–54L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Cara Williams
56W–42L career
3%95%1%
3.25
3.5
Richard Jennings
40W–66L career
not enough data
3.5
Richard Press
13W–23L career
not enough data
3.5
Thor Deacon
36W–39L career
not enough data
3.5
Yanchen Qi
29W–55L career
not enough data
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Tracey Hodgson
29W–34L career · type A
19%81%0%
3.10
3.5
Xia Yuan
53W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.