Teams

McMullen Oonk 7.5

2023 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Summer · 7.5 W Saturday

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesTori Disalvio / Laura Redmond vs Nadina Fiveland / Cheryl Kaiser6-1, 6-1
2023-08-26vs Seminole Lake Perfect ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Laurie Miller vs Diana Zarreke / Kimberly Northup2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-05vs Pinellas/Romero/18&Over7.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Barnard / Lisa Oonk vs Amy Brooks / Natalie Martinez5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGina Morgan / Tori Disalvio vs Michelle Meyer / Kelly Moore6-4, 6-1
2023-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Gina Morgan vs Kim Williams / Cheryl Kaiser6-2, 6-0
2023-07-15vs ELW FriesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTori Disalvio / Cambria Whalen vs Wendy Unger / Andrea Villafranca6-3, 6-2
2023-07-01vs Bardmoor What the Deuce?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTori Disalvio / Lisa Lowe vs Alize Uyttenhove Farhat / Carrie Kilgroe3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Alicia Castaneda
published 4
3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.75
Cambria Whalen
published 4
3.74
Tori Disalvio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Emily Signoracci
published 3.5
3.40
Elise Hall
published 3.5
Cindy Barnard
published 3.5
3.12
Karen Fischer
published
2.94
Lisa Lowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Castaneda + Monica Sanchez7353% games−0.4% vs expected
Elise Hall + Emily Signoracci10266% gamesnot enough data
Cambria Whalen + Lisa Oonk224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicia Castaneda
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–232L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cambria Whalen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Tori Disalvio
86W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Elise Hall
23W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Cindy Barnard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Fischer
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lisa Lowe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.