Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 18AM3.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-06vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesFadhly Bey / Jimmy Agustin vs Ramesh Konitineni / Suresh Nagavarapu0-6, 1-6
2024-06-01vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.0BWon 10
W#3 DoublesFadhly Bey / Ryan Dacayanan vs Ananth Manjapra / Saravanan Arumugam6-4, 6-1
2024-05-18vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 18AM3.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJimmy Agustin / Fadhly Bey vs Saravanakumar Srinivasan / Vikas Prakash6-0, 6-2
2024-05-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesFadhly Bey vs Vivek Bongu6-0, 6-0
2024-04-27vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.0CWon 10
W#1 DoublesJimmy Agustin / Fadhly Bey vs Praveen Gadi / Manoj Lakinana6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Dimitry Goldshteyn
published 3.5
3.23
Honglu Du
published 3.5
3.02
Fadhly Bey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.96
Rishi Sharma
published
2.93
Jimmy Agustin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Ryan Dacayanan
published
2.89
William Facteau
published
2.86
Frank Smith
published 3
Akshiv Malhotra
published 3
2.52
Andy Lee
published 3
2.50
Subha Ghoshal
published
2.48
Steve Lassig
published
Tianyao Lu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fadhly Bey + William Facteau18462% games+10.7% vs expected
Jimmy Agustin + Fadhly Bey4454% gamesnot enough data
Rishi Sharma + Ryan Dacayanan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dimitry Goldshteyn
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Honglu Du
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Fadhly Bey
38W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Rishi Sharma
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Jimmy Agustin
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Dacayanan
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
William Facteau
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Frank Smith
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Akshiv Malhotra
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Andy Lee
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
Subha Ghoshal
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Steve Lassig
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.48
Tianyao Lu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.