Teams

Lewis/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-02vs Bell/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesKeith Rice / Stephen Lewis vs Christopher Gray / Cory Heinkel4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Alvin Abston5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesOscar Carr / Patrick Kerley vs Kevin Turner / Wilson Baker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSteven Gubin vs Neal Patel6-7, 2-6
2025-10-05vs Gladstone/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJ R Cagle / Robert Rasch vs Ben Gladstone / Marc Mihalko6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Taylor Lackie6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSteven Gubin vs Michael Corey6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Keith Rice
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Neil Weston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
John Gleysteen
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.81
Steven Gubin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Brett Hughes
published 4
3.54
Oscar Carr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Patrick Kerley
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.36
Clayton Eber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael Holder
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
J R Cagle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Manuel Carro
published
Robert Rasch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Richardson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Rice
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.16
Neil Weston
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
John Gleysteen
27W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Steven Gubin
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Brett Hughes
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Oscar Carr
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Patrick Kerley
12W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Clayton Eber
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Michael Holder
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
J R Cagle
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Manuel Carro
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Rasch
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Todd Richardson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.