Teams

MEMPK LANGER

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs LTFCS MUELLERWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Ragauss / Terry Brunner vs Jean Mueller / Allison Flannery6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacy Simmons vs Tatiana Merkoulova3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Furr / Reta McKee vs Suzanne Draper / Shannon McCrary5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-13vs CCOC COLEMANLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Ragauss / Terry Brunner vs Kolsie Coleman / Barbara Jean Knorr6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesStacy Simmons vs Kit McFarland1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesReta McKee / Faith Collins vs Janet Luce / Anne Janda1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-06vs FLYHS COUTURESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaria Langer / Faith Collins vs Kristin Moore / Kristy Pring2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacy Simmons / Reta McKee vs Kristi Couture / Canada Coleman0-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs PBTC MITCHELLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Ragauss / Stacy Simmons vs Judy Mitchell / Emily Vidmar4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesReta McKee / Jennifer Furr vs Helen Arnold / Gail MacKin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-23vs LTFCS MUELLERWon 21
L#1 DoublesReta McKee / Terry Brunner vs Amy Obenchain / Ruth Zwolinski0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Ragauss vs Colleen Monahan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Langer / Faith Collins vs Kathryn Davis / Camille Ku3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MEMPK LANGER135719131
2LTFCS REED03271595

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Emily Ragauss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.21
Maria Langer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Jennifer Furr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Shelby Klug
published
3.06
Terry Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Faith Collins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Stacy Simmons
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Reta McKee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Furr + Reta McKee4546% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Ragauss
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
Maria Langer
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Shelby Klug
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Terry Brunner
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Faith Collins
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Stacy Simmons
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Reta McKee
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.