Teams

An.Redmond40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.96 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-19vs Am.Koch40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Ruggles / Dawn Johnstone vs Allison Dugan / AMY KOCH6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Dora Reed vs Sarah Ferguson / Jennifer Cotner6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Susan Starnes vs Margaret Barham / Jane Bossert6-4, 6-3
2026-05-12vs Li.McDermott40ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Suzanne Ruggles vs Casey Rainey / Kathryn Nani6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMonika Ahmad vs Christy Sandy6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Abigail Weaver vs Krystal Glover / Monica Gardner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Johnstone / Dora Reed vs Beth Farrell / Laurie Holderness2-6, 2-6
2026-05-05vs Je.SagalSolomon40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesDawn Johnstone / Suzanne Ruggles vs Marilyn Gordian / Michele Nowicki7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs Julia Wade4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAbigail Weaver / Jorgelina Stroud vs Gail Scoggin / Lori Sykes6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Allison Smith vs Susan Ellington / Jennifer Sagal Solomon6-2, 6-0
2026-04-28vs Ki.Lamb40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Redmond / Cheri Kivisto vs Jeannette Walker / Sarah Copley7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonika Ahmad / Abigail Weaver vs Dana Eaves / Tina Goertz6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDora Reed / Allison Smith vs Lindsay Bass / Cassy Albertson6-3, 6-1
2026-04-21vs Ch.Hochstrasser40ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Suzanne Ruggles vs April Lyon / Heather Hofmann6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMonika Ahmad vs Niezle Scott0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Johnstone / Abigail Weaver vs Marjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Gina Hartness vs McGavock Edwards / Diana Kennedy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-07vs As.Walker40AWon 31
L#1 DoublesSusan Starnes / Suzanne Ruggles vs Catherine Bray / Kari Barsness6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMonika Ahmad vs Liza Eaton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Redmond / Cheri Kivisto vs Britt Tolliver / Tiffany Thompson6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Allison Smith vs Elena Ryzhikova / Myra Peterson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-24vs As.Grantham40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheri Kivisto / Heath Hilliker vs Andrea Desonglo / Stephanie Testa6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnne Redmond / Ana Maria Allessi vs Ashley Grantham / Kimberly Lamm6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Starnes / Allison Smith vs Christine Dukiet / Patricia Zorko7-5, 6-1
2026-03-17vs Hop.Pflaum40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Lee / Susan Starnes vs Hope Pflaum / Candice Kish6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheri Kivisto / Anne Redmond vs Wendie Hill / Chandra Cahoon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Allison Smith vs Linda Nuxoll / Cheri Byrum6-2, 6-4
2026-03-10vs Am.Ray40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesCheri Kivisto / Anne Redmond vs Pamela Spell / Donna Driscoll6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAna Maria Allessi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMonika Ahmad / Susan Starnes vs Rhonda Rowe / Kimberlei Gill6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAllison Smith / Heath Hilliker vs Louella Venable / Carol Abercrombie6-2, 6-4
2026-03-03vs Ca.Grimes40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Redmond / Susan Starnes vs Lee Anne Oxford / Clare Bonifant0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHeath Hilliker / Monika Ahmad vs Meghan Richardson / Carter Grimes3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Hartness / Dora Reed vs Inma Navarro Galisteo / Joanne Butler6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings38 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Er.Hemminger40A10035518256
2As.Walker40A9134613204
3An.Redmond40A91271329293
4Je.Komes40A3.082281228275
5Kr.Gilreath40A3.082291129286
6Hop.Pflaum40A82281231303
7Sa.Kane40A82271331272
8Zo.Whitesell40A7024412165
9Cl.Duff40A7024415203
10Ca.Grimes40A73231736282
11Th.Roschel40A64231739337
12Ch.Hochstrasser40A64182250358
13Ju.Liddle40A5220818188
14Je.Wolborsky40A3.052181025241
15Ki.Meeker40A52151327221
16Li.McDermott40A55241637314
17Sh.Clarkson40A43161229254
18Ju.Clark40A43161231270
19Ju.Shuey40A43151332275
20Je.SagalSolomon40A46182254406
21La.McRee40A46142655375
22La.Daigle40A34131533267
23Ma.Basil40A34121634244
24Li.Howard40A34121634269
25As.Grantham40A37142656383
26We.Bargoil40A37152556395
27Am.Koch40A37132759406
28Br.Robinson40A37122859401
29Ka.Southern40A25121634273
30Me.Green40A25111738281
31Ch.Mccorquodale40A2591940286
32Mo.Garrell40A28152559416
33Ke.Hurter40A28112961406
34Ki.Lamb40A19112960402
35Ka.Landi40A19112964439
36An.Pershke40A0742450310
37Ki.Roberts40A0732551321
38Am.Ray40A010103066428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Monika Ahmad
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Cheri Kivisto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Abigail Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Suzanne Ruggles
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Dawn Johnstone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Anne Redmond
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Dora Reed
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.67
Heath Hilliker
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.57
Susan Starnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Gina Hartness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Kivisto + Heath Hilliker7360% games+11.7% vs expected
Jorgelina Stroud + Suzanne Ruggles181850% games+8.6% vs expected
Suzanne Ruggles + Laurene Fitzgerald151253% games+3.3% vs expected
Anne Redmond + Cheri Kivisto5554% games+2.3% vs expected
Jorgelina Stroud + Laurene Fitzgerald3941% games−7.8% vs expected
Ana Maria Allessi + Suzanne Ruggles5270% gamesnot enough data
Jorgelina Stroud + Ana Maria Allessi2448% gamesnot enough data
Dora Reed + Dawn Johnstone224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Monika Ahmad
38W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Cheri Kivisto
92W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Abigail Weaver
18W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Suzanne Ruggles
184W–162L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Dawn Johnstone
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Anne Redmond
18W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Dora Reed
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Heath Hilliker
46W–49L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 10 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Susan Starnes
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Gina Hartness
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.