Teams

MEMPK DIMBERIO

2026 TRIO - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-25vs CSRC ROSSWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Eastman / Karen Schaller vs Lisa Coyle / Amy Wooten6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKora Gwartney vs Brooke H Mitchell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Dimberio / Tiffney Martin vs Alicia Stier / Denice Yates2-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs CCOC MCBRIDESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Eastman / Karen Schaller vs Irene Larimer / Christie Lee6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKora Gwartney / Tiffney Martin vs Kendall Orr / Cody Ross0-6, 0-6
2026-04-04vs PBCP TURNERLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Eastman / Janet Mulvaney vs Ana Bhagat / Jami Cipriani4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Andrea DeAngelo4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Dimberio / Karen Schaller vs Melanie Turner / Holly Waller7-6, 7-6
2026-03-28vs CSCC SEIBERTLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Schaller / Laura Dimberio vs Carol Pepper / Hanna Andrus1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Kathryn Seibert1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTiffney Martin / Janet Mulvaney vs Kayla Walker / Susan Sanders0-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs FLYHS MEEHANLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Dimberio / Karen Schaller vs Megghan St Aubyn / Joy Barthelmes2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSherri Butler vs Sarah Vanderbeck6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKora Gwartney / Tiffney Martin vs Nancy Meehan / Tara Clawson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCOC MCBRIDE4093764
2LFTCS OSTLY3184873
3FLYHS MEEHAN318411105
4CSCC SEIBERT22751074
5PBCP TURNER237819154
6MEMPK DIMBERIO1441123162
7CSRC ROSS0421020122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Karen Schaller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Annette Eastman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Sherri Butler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.31
Kora Gwartney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.29
Tiffney Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Laura Dimberio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.11
Janet Mulvaney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Dimberio + Karen Schaller224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Schaller
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Annette Eastman
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Sherri Butler
11W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Kora Gwartney
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Tiffney Martin
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.29
Laura Dimberio
38W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Janet Mulvaney
18W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.