Teams

Toro - Net Success HoCo 18 3.0 Singles Men

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Patrick Hughes4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-19vs Yoon - Spin & Slice 3.0 SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Kabir Goyal3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesUmer Farooq vs Richie Wang6-1, 6-3
2025-10-10vs Yoon - Spin & Slice 3.0 SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs PAUL BAIK6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesUmer Farooq vs THOMAS AHN2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Alexander Sacker6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Patrick Hughes5-7, 5-7
2025-09-30vs Yoon - Spin & Slice 3.0 SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesUmer Farooq vs THOMAS AHN1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Djajaputra vs Richie Wang6-7, 0-1
2025-09-20vs Yoon - Spin & Slice 3.0 SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesUmer Farooq vs Kabir Goyal4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs Patrick Hughes2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 SinglesUmer Farooq vs Alexander Sodt6-0, 6-2
2025-09-02vs Yoon - Spin & Slice 3.0 SinglesLost 01
L#2 SinglesUMA SRIKUMARAN vs PAUL BAIK5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Tom Erdely
published
3.12
David Djajaputra
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.09
UMA SRIKUMARAN
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.88
Umer Farooq
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
published
2.85
Grant Chang
published
2.84
Eduardo Castillo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Djajaputra + Jose Toro5258% games+5.1% vs expected
David Djajaputra + UMA SRIKUMARAN2449% gamesnot enough data
Jose Toro + Tom Erdely134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Erdely
26W–55L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
David Djajaputra
137W–206L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
UMA SRIKUMARAN
53W–69L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Umer Farooq
27W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Grant Chang
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Eduardo Castillo
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.