Teams

Team Hutch

2024 55&Over Men · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-28vs B TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Darren Stohr vs Robert Casell / James Horne4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / Steven Mendelsohn vs Sanjeev Relan / Laszlo Mechtler0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGordy Sage / Ronald White vs Michael Urban / Yang Xiao7-6, 7-5
2024-07-21vs B TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / George Lund vs Carl DiNatale / Michael Urban1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTimothy Prise / Gordy Sage vs Glenn Snowden / David Cominsky6-3, 6-1
2024-07-06vs B TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaul Hutschenreuter / Timothy Prise vs Sanjeev Relan / Glenn Snowden4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDarren Stohr / James Glennon vs Laszlo Mechtler / Paul Herlan6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGordy Sage / Donald Nowak vs Michael Urban / Yang Xiao2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1B Team2154859
2Team Hutch12451295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Timothy Prise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Ronald White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Darren Stohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Gordy Sage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Paul Hutschenreuter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
James Glennon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Donald Nowak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
George Lund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth McCoy
published
Steven Mendelsohn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Prise + Gordy Sage4159% games+4.4% vs expected
Ronald White + Gordy Sage13555% games+2.0% vs expected
Ronald White + Timothy Prise404 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Prise + Paul Hutschenreuter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Prise
54W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Ronald White
67W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Darren Stohr
162W–191L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Gordy Sage
92W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Paul Hutschenreuter
128W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
James Glennon
67W–97L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Donald Nowak
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
George Lund
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth McCoy
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Mendelsohn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.