Teams

Sengupta (Crandon)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-12-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesSchubert Sengupta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesRodrigo Bermudez / Schubert Sengupta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-05vs Vitello (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / Jaime Sanchez vs Ennio de Vita / Jose Medina6-7, 3-6
2021-10-28vs Carroll (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeonardo Concha / Federico Molinari vs Emilio Zapata / Daniel Faust6-4, 6-2
2021-10-26vs Moore (Coral Pine)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGerardo Raven / Schubert Sengupta vs Lennyn Salinas / Patrick Sendowski5-7, 4-6
2021-10-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / CARLOS FIGUERA vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / CARLOS FIGUERA vs Michael Friedman / Mark Weinberg5-7, 3-6
2021-10-08vs Lamis (Coral Pine)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / PATRICIO DERITO vs Nicholas Lamis / Jason James6-2, 6-2
2021-10-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / Jaime Sanchez vs Felipe Lahrssen / Julian Rivera6-2, 6-3
2021-09-16vs Nunez (Riviera Prep)Won 10
W#3 DoublesFlorian Hafner / Federico Molinari vs George Hanson / Jesse Jones6-2, 6-4
2021-09-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesSchubert Sengupta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Oscar Garcia
published
3.70
Jaime Sanchez
published 4
3.63
MANAV SHARMA
published
3.55
Leonardo Concha
published
3.48
Federico Molinari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Schubert Sengupta
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.21
Daniel MacHado
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Schubert Sengupta + Federico Molinari5749% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oscar Garcia
19W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Jaime Sanchez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
MANAV SHARMA
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Leonardo Concha
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Federico Molinari
252W–115L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Schubert Sengupta
298W–227L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Daniel MacHado
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.