Teams

KY/LOU/KIRBY

2022 USTA COMBO 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Juw Won Park
published
Christopher Rice
published 4
3.57
Han Cho
published 3.5
3.42
Jonathan Hahn
published
3.40
Connor Walsh
published 3.5
3.38
Brian Belva
published 3.5
3.22
Jeremy Thompson
published
3.19
Justin Dzan
published
3.18
Adam Kirby
published 3.5
3.13
Gung-Min Gie
published 3.5
2.79
Richard Cotton
published
2.74
Adam Norrenbrock
published 3
Richard Paek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Hahn + Han Cho5649% games+5.5% vs expected
Adam Kirby + Jonathan Hahn134 matchesnot enough data
Han Cho + Juw Won Park303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juw Won Park
32W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Christopher Rice
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Han Cho
64W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Jonathan Hahn
38W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Connor Walsh
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Brian Belva
53W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Jeremy Thompson
28W–50L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Justin Dzan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Adam Kirby
19W–36L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Gung-Min Gie
28W–55L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Richard Cotton
22W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Adam Norrenbrock
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Richard Paek
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.