Teams

KTreece (Sardis)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-02vs SMyers (Mason Wallace)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Berka / Deborah Spaugh vs Joeline Ohlhaut / Susan Grills6-3, 6-3
2024-09-13vs LCampbell/MEccleston (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKendra Treece / Deborah Spaugh vs Dana Holloman / Kristy Simmons1-6, 2-6
2024-09-06vs EPease (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Zelickson / Chanler Krupa vs Laura Brandt / Diana Blocker6-1, 6-4
2024-08-30vs FHaselden (Palisades CC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Lindsay Thompson vs Cindy Harty / Lisa Gregoire3-6, 2-6
2024-08-23vs STrivanovic (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Spaugh / Christina Wright vs Monica Larios / Erin Colonna6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-21vs KMassaro (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Thomas / Erin Zelickson vs Brandi Hoover / Victoria Sofarelli1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Chanler Krupa
published 3.5
3.47
Kendra Treece
published 3.5
3.42
Erin Zelickson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Emily Battle
published 3.5
3.29
Katie Ferry
published
3.29
Lynn Selland
published
3.27
Jessica Walker
published
3.25
Valerie Gray
published
2.95
Deborah Spaugh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Christina Wright
published 3
2.80
Elizabeth Tabor
published 3
Karen Berka
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chanler Krupa
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Kendra Treece
62W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Erin Zelickson
82W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Katie Ferry
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Lynn Selland
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Jessica Walker
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Valerie Gray
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Deborah Spaugh
48W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Christina Wright
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Tabor
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Karen Berka
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.