Teams

Team 4 - Triple Threat

2021 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChandra Shekhar Ramshetti / Tracey White vs Katrina Tiedeman / Santosh Mohan1-6, 3-6
2021-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChandra Shekhar Ramshetti / Patricia Shepard vs Erin Green / Brandon Rebok1-6, 0-6
2021-05-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrendy Hantzes / Senthil Kumar Seetharaman vs Carrie Alfalaij / Roger Cheng2-6, 2-6
2021-05-08vs Team 2 - Crazy EightsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Hagood / Senthil Kumar Seetharaman vs Kara Stevenson / Chip Hathaway6-4, 5-4
2021-05-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVanessa Ogilvie / Senthil Kumar Seetharaman vs Katrina Tiedeman / Chris Ford3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-04-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrendy Hantzes / Ryan Poole vs Katrina Tiedeman / Santosh Mohan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jenna Hagood
published
4.27
Soheil Shirzadi
published
4.17
Bob White
published 4.5
3.82
Senthil Kumar Seetharaman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Alan Ogilvie
published 4
3.65
Paul Lluy
published
3.65
Patricia Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Tracey White
published
3.48
Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Ryan Poole
published
3.18
Elizabeth Hamilton
published 3.5
3.16
Brendy Hantzes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Susannah Forde
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Hagood
45W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.38
Soheil Shirzadi
17W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Bob White
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Senthil Kumar Seetharaman
171W–118L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Alan Ogilvie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Paul Lluy
21W–13L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Patricia Shepard
74W–139L career · 1 line in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.65
Tracey White
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Chandra Shekhar Ramshetti
78W–85L career · 2 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
Ryan Poole
27W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Elizabeth Hamilton
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Brendy Hantzes
39W–84L career · 2 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Susannah Forde
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.