Teams

GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 18 & Over League · 3.0 Men 18 & over

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-14vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJames Hardison / Greg Baggett vs David Thomas / Michael Kabler5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesQuentin Thigpen vs Turner Provo7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesClifton Game / Terry Dawson vs Mark Wuntke / Brad Beissner2-6, 4-6
2026-04-07vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJames Hardison / Quentin Thigpen vs Mark Wuntke / Turner Provo7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesClifton Game / Richard Moye vs Michael Kabler / Matlock Stocks6-7, 1-6
2026-03-31vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDoyle Thigpen / Quentin Thigpen vs David Thomas / David Brown7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGreg Baggett vs Turner Provo6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Hardison / Richard Moye vs Brad Beissner / Mark Wuntke3-6, 5-7
2026-03-26vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClifton Game / Richard Moye vs Mark Wuntke / Brad Beissner2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesQuentin Thigpen vs Matlock Stocks6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGreg Baggett / Terry Dawson vs David Brown / David Thomas4-6, 4-6
2026-03-17vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesClifton Game / Richard Moye vs David Brown / Turner Provo2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTerry Dawson vs Matlock Stocks3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesQuentin Thigpen / James Hardison vs David Thomas / Mark Wuntke6-2, 6-3
2026-03-10vs GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)Won 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Baggett / James Hardison vs Mark Wuntke / Matlock Stocks6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesQuentin Thigpen vs Turner Provo6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Dawson / Clifton Game vs Brad Beissner / David Thomas6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Baggett (18s 3.0M SP)3310818167
2GR-Wuntke (18s 3.0M SP)3381020167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Greg Baggett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Quentin Thigpen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Doyle Thigpen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
James Hardison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Terry Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.60
Clifton Game
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Frank Seymour
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Baggett
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Quentin Thigpen
17W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Doyle Thigpen
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
James Hardison
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
Terry Dawson
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Clifton Game
2W–14L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Frank Seymour
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.