Teams

JHargis (Pine Lake)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Vagnerini / Kelly Guadagnino vs Elizabeth Kennard / Barbara Davis3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Barnes / Ashle Basden vs SJ Pragasam / Vicki King1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Edwards / Gretchen Pfeiffer vs Jennifer Little / Liesl Graf0-6, 1-6
2026-08-26vs JMugnano (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Vagnerini / Chelsea Krahn vs Sarah Barden / Melissa Kaufman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGretchen Pfeiffer / Lynsey Weber vs Krisha Blanchard / Kathleen Mcdonnell0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Beth Barnes vs Nicole Nelson / Ashley Duncan5-7, 6-7
2026-08-19vs SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Guadagnino / Sarah Krenz vs Olivia French / Jeanette Pellot6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshle Basden / Beth Barnes vs Alyssa Collado / Sarah Harris6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Edwards / Rebecca Lothe vs Cassidy Hall / Marissa Louer6-0, 6-4
2026-08-12vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Guadagnino / Sarah Krenz vs Sheila Passenant / Trisha Smith7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGretchen Pfeiffer / Sara Cannon vs Lindsey Ferguson / Christina Dunn0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLynsey Weber / Virginia Borkey vs Cindy Rhoten / Sarah Garner1-6, 0-6
2026-08-05vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Lothe / Lynsey Weber vs Heather Carter / Martha Metzl1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Guadagnino / Karen Holbrook vs Jane Bee / Claudia Prager2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Kelly Edwards vs Lauren Earley / Celeste Horton2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)3090149
2MWalters (Carmel)3081453
3MWolf/JShelley (WSRC)3072559
4VShannon (Raintree)3081558
5RJoplin (Queens)3063770
6JWaleski (OPRC)2051227
7AMcGarry/AIngalls (CSRC)2051345
8LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)2042446
9TRicks (Queens)2042552
10LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC)2172667
11MMetzl (Sardis)2163761
12JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades)21541086
13AChristie/ASmith (PPRSC)21541074
14MLong/SFarley (Queens)1142548
15AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC)1142657
16HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)1133655
17RVora/SMoon (Lifetime)1133752
18DCazorla (BCC)1254980
19SLind (Bridgehampton)1254968
20ELeMaitre (Park Road)12541083
21SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)12541084
22MAllen/SStork (Sardis)12451195
23SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)12361387
24MLGarrison (Sardis)12361394
25CKing (Life Time)12271498
26PSweeney (FCC)122715101
27APessina/LAbhoulson (Queens)0224850
28SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)0224868
29BBaker (Queens)0224855
30CArevalo (Park Road)0224963
31CTharp (Queens)02151061
32JHargis (Pine Lake)02151069
33JMugnano (Queens)02061271
34LCulp (Park Road)03181694
35KWagner (Jeff Adams)030918105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Krenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Ashle Basden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Anna Vagnerini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Rebecca Lothe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Beth Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Lynsey Weber
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Karen Holbrook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Virginia Borkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chelsea Krahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Jessica Hargis
published 2.5
Gretchen Pfeiffer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Guadagnino
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Krenz
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Anna Vagnerini
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3.5
Rebecca Lothe
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Beth Barnes
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Lynsey Weber
22W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Karen Holbrook
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
3
Virginia Borkey
23W–56L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
2.5
Chelsea Krahn
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Jessica Hargis
11W–26L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Gretchen Pfeiffer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Guadagnino
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.