Teams

Quogue, Belkin

2026 40&Over Mixed · 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-01vs LIHR, Adams/FreemanWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Dan Derosalia / Merri Laffitte6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTheresa Belkin / Brian Nesler vs Dilip Nair / Laura Nigro4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaudia Arango / Andrew Maresca vs Donald Henn / Lisa Frey6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs Lynbrook, Healy/CoddettLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Roydon Coddett / Atara SImpson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTheresa Belkin / Brian Nesler vs Ogbonna Chilaka / Rosalyn Beswick6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarina Meyers / Trevor Hoey vs Talbert Isaacs / Yanshon Fullwood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-17vs Blue Point, SubjectWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Armando Lastra / Nicole Bove6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Schumacher / Brian Nesler vs Darren Amadio / Alexandra Hurley7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTheresa Winter / Trevor Hoey vs William Stubelek / Tara Shannon7-5, 6-2
2026-03-29vs WTC: Mix 8.0 Flying TricksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Tatiana Valverde / Isagani Soriano Aves3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Winter / Robert Remolador vs Bonnie Aves / Dheeraj Bhatia4-6, 5-7
2026-03-22vs LI: Park Ave, SiegelLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Michelle Craddock / Michael Proothi2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Remolador / Evangeline Boutin vs Francesca Roth / Joshua Rogowsky2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrevor Hoey / Lauren Rosenblatt vs Brett Helfner / Tanya Kotov2-6, 3-6
2026-03-13vs Deer Park, StevensonWon 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Belkin / Brian Nesler vs Timothy Hill / Jaimie Person6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Arango / Michael Burrell vs Kevin Bunting / Suzanne Ciserano4-6, 7-6
2026-03-06vs Roslyn, Freger/GershonLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Raimundas Rakauskas vs Claire Lin / Albert Potgieter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Arango / Robert Remolador vs Marc Mandelbaum / Lucy Wu0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Belkin / Peter Candela vs Kimberly Gershon / Samir Shah2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-08vs Point Set, Blue/LowLost 12
L#1 DoublesTheresa Belkin / Peter Candela vs Jung Park / Antonella Karlin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah Flohr / Robert Remolador vs Mitchell Low / Therese Stowell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Maresca / Evangeline Boutin vs Shanon Blue / Mark Dinsay5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Theresa Belkin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.86
Rebekah Flohr
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.86
Claudia Arango
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Catherine Schumacher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Theresa Winter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Evangeline Boutin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Marina Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Lauren Rosenblatt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Agne Rakauskas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Andrew Maresca
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.30
Brian Nesler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Michael Burrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Candela
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Raimundas Rakauskas
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
Robert Remolador
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trevor Hoey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Raimundas Rakauskas + Agne Rakauskas8160% gamesnot enough data
Peter Candela + Marina Meyers6251% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Maresca + Agne Rakauskas5158% gamesnot enough data
Raimundas Rakauskas + Rebekah Flohr4245% gamesnot enough data
Robert Remolador + Evangeline Boutin314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Maresca + Marina Meyers213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Remolador + Theresa Winter123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Nesler + Theresa Belkin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Belkin
45W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Rebekah Flohr
35W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Claudia Arango
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Catherine Schumacher
27W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Theresa Winter
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Evangeline Boutin
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marina Meyers
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Lauren Rosenblatt
40W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Agne Rakauskas
58W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
4
Andrew Maresca
48W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Brian Nesler
7W–1L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Michael Burrell
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Candela
20W–13L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raimundas Rakauskas
22W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Remolador
39W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trevor Hoey
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.