Teams

BP RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-27vs WP-C PURPLELost 02
L#2 DoublesEmily Jensik / Rosemary Garcia vs Clare Morey / Julie Lang3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTalia Cioth / Mary Nelson vs Michelle Foreman / Christine Hong3-6, 3-6
2025-05-20vs CACM GREENWon 10
W#2 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Carlie Odau4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-13vs LTC-M GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTalia Cioth / Andrea Philleo vs Mary Brennan / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Keiko Kasho / Sarah Megilligan6-3, 7-5
2025-05-10vs LTC-M YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesCasey Ahrendsen / Meg Staebell vs Michelle Wadas / Shellie Hall6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Emily Jensik vs Anne Torkelson / Ajyra JONES5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Lisa Robinson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Lane / Andrea Philleo vs Leigha Cochran / Haley Hopkins5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-29vs CP BLUEWon 21
L#2 DoublesMeg Staebell / Leslie Lane vs Irene Mendelsberg / Sally Morris2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTalia Cioth vs Shaye McAuliffe6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Jensik / Mary Nelson vs Stephanie Campbell / Karen Payne6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-22vs WP-C PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Kelsey Berlin / Irina Suyumova6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Nelson / Yukiko Brooks vs Jackie Hawkey / Elise Wood6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRosemary Garcia / Emily Jensik vs Michelle Foreman / Christine Hong4-6, 2-6
2025-04-15vs CACM GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lane / Meg Staebell vs Michelle Degitis / Carlie Odau5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Nelson / Yukiko Brooks vs Katherine Ferraro / Rachel Heise7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndrea Philleo vs Risa Silverman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Casey Ahrendsen
published 4.5
4.30
Talia Cioth
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Charlotte Rhoad
published 4.5
4.19
Meg Staebell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.13
Leslie Lane
published
4.10
Denise Hernandez
published 4.5
4.09
Andrea Philleo
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
published
4.04
Christi Valicenti
published 4.5
3.96
Yukiko Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Emily Jensik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.67
Mary Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Brooks + Mary Nelson1541% games+10.3% vs expected
Meg Staebell + Leslie Lane19560% games+9.4% vs expected
Denise Hernandez + Casey Ahrendsen2551% games+1.5% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Andrea Philleo2346% games−0.9% vs expected
Rosemary Garcia + Yukiko Brooks31144% games−2.6% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Meg Staebell2442% games−3.4% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Talia Cioth4644% games−5.0% vs expected
Andrea Philleo + Yukiko Brooks2634% games−14.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Casey Ahrendsen
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Talia Cioth
74W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Meg Staebell
73W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Leslie Lane
131W–68L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Denise Hernandez
55W–73L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Andrea Philleo
52W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Rosemary Garcia
17W–49L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Christi Valicenti
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4.5
Emily Jensik
44W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.88
Mary Nelson
51W–49L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.