Teams

1-SDNC 4.0 RPTC (2:2)/ Yeem

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDavid Yang / Derek Bruton vs Julio Alonso / Prasanna Parthasarathy5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRand Smith / Steve Leffler vs Jeff Oslance / Rahul Sharma3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRand Smith / Wilson Yongkap Yeem vs Steve Soderholm / Ahmet Tutuncu6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Yang / Derek Bruton vs Dave Gehrke / Christopher Platt6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-05vs 2-SDNC 4.0 RBS&TC (3:1)/ RobergeLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Leffler / Wilson Yongkap Yeem vs Wilfredo Soria / Mark Logan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDerek Bruton / Rand Smith vs Jason Alfrey / Scott Quintal2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRand Smith / Derek Bruton vs Bob Boehnlein / Mike Sartwell6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRand Smith / Ron Seager vs Andrew Dewey / Douglas Sain6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Lei / Steve Leffler vs Karl Kasai / Craig Hauser3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRand Smith / Derek Bruton vs Stepan Kartsub / Michael Urcelay4-6, 3-6
2023-01-08vs SDNC LLW 4.0 KCP/ NguyenLost 02
L#1 DoublesRand Smith / Derek Bruton vs Michael Russo / Kien Johnson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRon Seager / Dana Gibson vs Don Plunkett / Ignacio Medina3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Wilson Yongkap Yeem
published
3.67
Rand Smith
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Edward Lei
published 4
3.54
Ron Seager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Derek Bruton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Dana Gibson
published 3.5
3.22
Steve Leffler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Bruton + Rand Smith81246% games+0.6% vs expected
Ron Seager + Rand Smith1444% gamesnot enough data
Derek Bruton + Ron Seager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wilson Yongkap Yeem
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Rand Smith
94W–100L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Edward Lei
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Ron Seager
47W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Derek Bruton
41W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dana Gibson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Steve Leffler
54W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.