Teams

2-MMacdonald-HS-55/6.0Mixed

2023 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-17vs 1-DNagelhout-HSWon 10
W#3 DoublesVan Blalock / Jennifer Hoffmann vs David Nagelhout / Linda Nagelhout6-0, 6-2
2023-07-03vs 1-DNagelhout-HSWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hoffmann / Van Blalock vs Thomas Rexrode / Leslie Jackson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMillicent Snow / Jeff Denhard vs Linda Naden / David Nagelhout6-2, 6-0
2023-06-28vs 1-DNagelhout-HSSplit 11
L#2 DoublesVan Blalock / Dori Liller vs David Nagelhout / Kristen Bradfield6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Denhard / Millicent Snow vs Hayes Hofler / Linda Nagelhout6-4, 6-2
2023-06-12vs 1-DNagelhout-HSWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Denhard / Millicent Snow vs Russell Davis / Linda Naden6-2, 7-5
2023-06-05vs 1-DNagelhout-HSWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Holt / Dori Liller vs Linda Nagelhout / Hayes Hofler6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Denhard / Millicent Snow vs David Naden / Cathy Williams6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Michael Holt
published
3.29
Millicent Snow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Scott Hartman
published
3.06
David Stefan
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Macdonald
published
2.90
Tracy Stefan
published
2.85
Mary Macdonald
published
2.77
Jeff Denhard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Deborah Brown
published 3
2.63
Van Blalock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.55
Dori Liller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chris Konvalinka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Liller + Jeff Denhard3253% gamesnot enough data
Millicent Snow + Jeff Denhard404 matchesnot enough data
Dori Liller + Van Blalock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Holt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Millicent Snow
68W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Scott Hartman
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
David Stefan
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mark Macdonald
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tracy Stefan
25W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
Mary Macdonald
25W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Jeff Denhard
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Deborah Brown
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%16%84%
2.63
3
Dori Liller
104W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Chris Konvalinka
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.