Teams

Disruptors

2025 COMBO · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-13vs Combo ChicasLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Vafadari / Rebecca Alarid vs Julie Wiernik / Linh Nguyen6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTalena Lorren / Kayla Fonger vs Bridget Noack / Veronica Flores4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-12vs JNCC UriarteLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Villegas / Rebecca Alarid vs Gina Agurcia / Virginia Raborn4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Boebel / Lisa Tramontano vs Kailey Jonas / Samantha Kadish1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Merritt / Andrea Turk vs Mallery Bourquin / Vicki Contreras2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Combo ChicasLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Villegas / Kayla Fonger vs Joy Meltzer / Paula Decas6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLindsay Houchen / Andrea Turk vs Julie Wiernik / Kristin Ortiz6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTalena Lorren / Kellie Johnson vs Jill Rogers Fitch / Catherine Babbitt4-6, 3-6
2025-04-11vs JNCC UriarteLost 12
L#1 DoublesTalena Lorren / Kellie Johnson vs Kelsey Altgelt / Vicki Contreras6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Merritt / Nancy Almaraz vs Gina Agurcia / Virginia Raborn3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Houchen / Andrea Turk vs Kathy Uriarte / Samantha Kadish0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Stacey Boebel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.45
Lauren Villegas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Christina Merritt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Alexandria Vafadari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Talena Lorren
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Nancy Almaraz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Andrea Turk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Kayla Fonger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Lisa Tramontano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Rebecca Alarid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Houchen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Boebel
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Lauren Villegas
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Christina Merritt
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Alexandria Vafadari
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Talena Lorren
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
Nancy Almaraz
32W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Andrea Turk
56W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kayla Fonger
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Lisa Tramontano
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Rebecca Alarid
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Lindsay Houchen
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.