Teams

ACAC Bryan

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-07vs ACAC JonesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Hunt / Alexander Smith vs Anthony Forgey / Brycen Bascomb4-6, 2-6
2024-08-11vs Willow Oaks- CampbellLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnthony Hunt / Jon Long-Leary vs Steve Campbell / Jeff Moehling6-7, 4-6
2024-07-27vs MAC Cousins ReduxLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnthony Hunt / Roberto Sarmento vs Jeremy Calbreath / Roger Wisor3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Glenn Pfluger
published
3.59
Matt Sebetic
published 4
3.28
Anthony Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Thomas Wilson
published
3.11
Alexander Smith
published 3.5
2.95
Roberto Sarmento
published
2.64
Steven Applegate
published
2.22
Hamilton Bryan
published
Jon Long-Leary
published
Mark Rogers
published
Rodney Orcutt
published
Thomas Chelimsky
published
William Hollowell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenn Pfluger
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Matt Sebetic
158W–90L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Anthony Hunt
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Thomas Wilson
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Alexander Smith
18W–37L career · type A · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Roberto Sarmento
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Steven Applegate
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Hamilton Bryan
12W–32L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Jon Long-Leary
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Rogers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rodney Orcutt
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Chelimsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Hollowell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.