Teams

Biloxi - Shoemake

2026 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs DH-ThompsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Robinson / Jack Robinson vs Sheldon Zhang / Mary Kay Walk6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Howell / Paul Benigno vs Kathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDianne Holloway / Dana Ladnier vs Kevin Martin / Michelle Foley0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-02vs DH-ThompsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Robinson / Paul Benigno vs Jennifer Hailes / Phil Schmidt6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Howell / Jack Robinson vs Kathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHenry P Calamari / Sherri White vs Joseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-28vs DH-ThompsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Benigno / Dianne Holloway vs Kathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Robinson / Dana Ladnier vs Phil Schmidt / Mary Kay Walk6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJack Robinson / Amanda Letonoff vs Shannon Hailes / Jennifer Hailes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-25vs DH-ThompsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesDianne Holloway / Chris Emerson vs April Mechatto / Michael Thompson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Letonoff / Henry P Calamari vs Jennifer Hailes / Shannon Hailes6-4, 6-4
2026-06-14vs DH-ThompsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesHenry P Calamari / Sherri White vs Joseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Howell / Dana Ladnier vs Shannon Hailes / Jennifer Hailes7-6, 6-4
2026-06-11vs DH-ThompsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Howell / Paul Benigno vs Jennifer Hailes / Sheldon Zhang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherri White / Chris Emerson vs Nicole Montagnet / Michael Thompson7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Robinson / Dana Ladnier vs Kathleen Marlowe / Colin Jones3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Biloxi - Shoemake601809132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Sherri White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Dana Ladnier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Dianne Holloway
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chris Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Henry P Calamari
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Jack Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Nancy Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Christina Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Amanda Letonoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Phyllis Shoemake
published
Paul Benigno
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Benigno + Amanda Letonoff3261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherri White
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
4.11
4
Dana Ladnier
27W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Dianne Holloway
49W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Chris Emerson
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Henry P Calamari
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Jack Robinson
14W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Nancy Howell
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Christina Robinson
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
4
Amanda Letonoff
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Phyllis Shoemake
19W–9L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Paul Benigno
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.