Teams

Players Club / Wauters

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Kraft / Jill Kerxton vs Lori Poulin / Dawn Burt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-28vs Island Country Club / K. MillerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Kraft / Cathy de Bear vs Keely Miller / Karen Crines3-6, 2-6
2025-02-17vs Naples Reserve / HugginsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy de Bear / Michelle Kraft vs Diana Britton / Ramsay Erickson5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-02-10vs COLLIER/Washak/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesCathy de Bear / Michelle Kraft vs Sindi Sanzica / Andrea Washak6-4, 6-3
2025-02-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesCrystie Ciriello / Michelle Kraft vs Deborah Miller / Terri Tucci3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-27vs Naples Bay Club / StaropoliWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Kraft / Sheila Smith vs Ricki Levine / Valerie Khammash7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-20vs Island Country Club / K. MillerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Kraft / Sherry Cummings vs Suzanne Messere / Renee Facciola6-7, 4-6
2025-01-13vs Naples Reserve / HugginsWon 10
W#3 DoublesCathy de Bear / Michelle Kraft vs Lori Irvin Hawes / Peggy Stefanac6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Cathy de Bear
published 4
3.68
Michelle Kraft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.65
Crystie Ciriello
published 4
3.46
Carrie Noviello
published 4
3.25
Coleen Mohler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Sackett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Kerxton
published
Jill Wauters
published
Lissa Andrakakos
published
Maureen Powers
published
Sherry Cummings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Sackett + Coleen Mohler3348% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Kraft + Jill Wauters224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy de Bear
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Michelle Kraft
50W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.68
4
Crystie Ciriello
1W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Carrie Noviello
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Coleen Mohler
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lisa Sackett
115W–89L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jill Kerxton
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Wauters
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lissa Andrakakos
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Powers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Cummings
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.