Teams

Eagle Harbor - Jones

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Women - Summer · 4.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-31vs Glen Kernan Binaco-OssiWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Sutton / Tameka Bezue-Jackson vs Kari Barron / Danijela Pope6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheri Woods / Tammy Myers vs Cherie Johnson / Cara Binaco0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Linge / Mary Holley vs Amber Kenney / Cheryle Gregory6-0, 6-3
2025-07-24vs San Jose - WinslowWon 21
L#1 DoublesJolene Hamel / Kathy Sapp vs Heather Riley / Nancy Hennessy4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Schermerhorn / Gail Olsen vs Julie Boone / Allison Wise6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Holley / Beth Jansen vs Carissa Hammel / Allison Stephanuik4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-07-10vs Sawgrass - WrightWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexa Fritz / Kathy Sapp vs Julie Barney / Diane Lickliter4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-19vs The Plantation - PensottiWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Schermerhorn / Kandee Townsend vs Renee Callahan / Kelly Davis6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Waroff / Tammy Myers vs Kelly Valentine / Rhonda Sutaria3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBeth Jansen / Patricia Linge vs Colleen Licata / Janet Fitzgerald7-5, 6-2
2025-06-12vs ABCC - MerrimanLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexa Fritz / Tameka Bezue-Jackson vs Brooke Anderson / Shylo Kline4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-05vs Timuquana - CrawfordLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexa Fritz / Kathy Sapp vs Margaret Moore / Katie Deering1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Alexa Fritz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Tameka Bezue-Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Gail Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Kandee Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Tammy Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kathy Sapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Mary Holley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Kristen Schermerhorn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Lori Aiosa
published
3.15
Annabelle Matias
published 3.5
3.15
Jolene Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Sheri Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jill Waroff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Mehgan Moore
published
2.91
Deana Jones
published 3
2.80
Patricia Linge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Stephanie Rouse
published
2.58
Beth Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Aimee Real-Robinson
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kandee Townsend + Gail Olsen3350% games−7.6% vs expected
Kandee Townsend + Kathy Sapp0539% games−9.7% vs expected
Annabelle Matias + Jill Waroff314 matchesnot enough data
Kandee Townsend + Lori Aiosa303 matchesnot enough data
Jolene Hamel + Jill Waroff213 matchesnot enough data
Tameka Bezue-Jackson + Mary Holley213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Schermerhorn + Gail Olsen303 matchesnot enough data
Mary Holley + Gail Olsen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexa Fritz
67W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Tameka Bezue-Jackson
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Gail Olsen
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Kandee Townsend
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Tammy Myers
14W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Kathy Sapp
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Sutton
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Holley
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Kristen Schermerhorn
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Lori Aiosa
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Annabelle Matias
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sheri Woods
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jill Waroff
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mehgan Moore
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Patricia Linge
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Stephanie Rouse
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Beth Jansen
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Aimee Real-Robinson
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.