Teams

A18 4.5W KI Mazzola

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-19vs A18 4.5W NC PryorLost 23
W#1 DoublesAshley Kriwinsky / Jennifer Snyder vs Madison Altman / Evie Pryor6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKarla Kruse vs Alison Snook6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMartha Adams / Erin O'Brien vs Marcie Pryor / Cristin Reed4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMorgan Mills vs Michelle Dalton0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Ubersax / Katy Hirst Lucci vs Jodie Freetage / Patricia Paschke5-7, 1-6
2023-06-12vs OH NEO A18 4.5W CraneLost 13
L#1 DoublesJanet Mazzola / Courtney Thompson vs Natasha Birze / Shannon Newnes0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Merriman / Wan Collier vs Sara Crane / Maria Ciccolini7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristin Ubersax vs Ieva Balcus2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKarla Kruse / Martha Adams vs Lauren Castagnero / Morgan Wagers7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-05vs A18 4.5W PW KuriLost 13
W#1 DoublesAshley Kriwinsky / Karla Kruse vs Molly Bauer / Melissa Djohan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCourtney Thompson / Janet Mazzola vs Tiffany Allison / Rebecca Pope6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMorgan Mills vs Allison Welch2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Merriman / Ellie Krutowsky vs Kristen Pigg / Lisa Wissman4-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs A18 4.5W PM KavenaghWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Mazzola / Courtney Thompson vs Kayley Gimbel / Elizabeth Stuart6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKarla Kruse / Wan Collier vs Kristina Dillon / Calista Bobula6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesAshley Kriwinsky vs Madeline Kavenagh7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-15vs A18 4.5W GR OwenWon 40
W#1 DoublesJanet Mazzola / Courtney Thompson vs Jenna Montisano / Jill Hanigofsky7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHolly Etzkin vs Melissa Owen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarla Kruse / Ellie Krutowsky vs Renee Weaver / Julie Deluca6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMiki Nakamoto / Morgan Mills vs Loralee Daily / Lori Digiacomo6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-08vs A18 4.5W WE SchronWon 31
L#1 DoublesKarla Kruse / Traci Davis vs Kristin Schron / Katie Allan4-3
W#1 SinglesHolly Etzkin vs LIsa Henkel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCourtney Thompson / Janet Mazzola vs Kim Hodgkiss-Lilly / Margaret Hodgkiss-Lilly7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMartha Adams / Ellie Krutowsky vs Jenn Gates / Lauren Fockler6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A18 4.5W Crane6024618228
2A18 4.5W WE Schron42181227245
3A18 4.5W KI Mazzola33171328254
4A18 4.5W PW Kuri33151535273
5A18 4.5W NC Pryor33131735269
6A18 4.5W PM Kavenagh1592147313
7A18 4.5W GR Owen1592147314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Kriwinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Courtney Thompson
published 4.5
4.25
Wan Collier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Holly Etzkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Morgan Mills
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.82
Martha Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ellie Krutowsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Erin O'Brien
published 4
3.66
Miki Nakamoto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Kristin Ubersax
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Janet Mazzola
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jennifer Merriman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karla Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Katy Hirst Lucci
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Traci Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Davis + Ellie Krutowsky4168% games+2.5% vs expected
Janet Mazzola + Jennifer Merriman6166% games+1.0% vs expected
Janet Mazzola + Courtney Thompson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Kriwinsky
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Courtney Thompson
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wan Collier
16W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Holly Etzkin
48W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.21
Morgan Mills
74W–29L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Martha Adams
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Ellie Krutowsky
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Erin O'Brien
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Miki Nakamoto
32W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kristin Ubersax
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Janet Mazzola
24W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Merriman
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Kruse
5W–2L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Hirst Lucci
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Traci Davis
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.