Teams

LTC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs LPTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Jennifer Kramer vs Pat Cantrell / Nicolle McKinney7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLiz Hafer vs Su Chae6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristine O'Brien / Brigid McClaire vs Kerri Stroupe / Julie Byron2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTia Heneghan / Karen Hyde vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-13vs NJ NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Terri Jenney vs Anne Lutz / Becky McGowan6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristine O'Brien vs Julie Steven5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Liz Hafer vs Kathy Hardin / Christine Loehr6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Hyde / Tia Heneghan vs Jessica Anderson / Zhenzhen Yu6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-06vs NJ GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Judith McKinney vs Kris Hansen / Kelly Stratman6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTerri Jenney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Liz Hafer vs Jennifer Lyons / Barbara Westfall0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Karen Hyde vs Sheila O'Neill / Rose Foster0-6, 0-6
2021-06-29vs RHCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Kristine O'Brien vs Jennifer Curtis-Jones / Kari Eckert1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Sandra Michel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Terri Jenney vs Tiffany Skiles / Emilee Noyes6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Karen Hyde vs Liby Zachariah / Erin Jackman6-2, 7-6
2021-06-22vs HIW REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesTerri Jenney / Kristine O'Brien vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Kelly Cavin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Angela Appleby0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Judith McKinney vs Amanda Corrigan / Rhonda Wilson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Mary Johanson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-15vs LPTC REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Judith McKinney vs Su Chae / Nicolle McKinney6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Laurel Kung4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTia Heneghan / Terri Jenney vs Priscilla Flanders / Michele Dine4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Betsy Duryea vs Pat Cantrell / Julie Byron3-6, 2-6
2021-06-08vs NJ NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Judith McKinney vs Anne Townsel / Kathy Hardin6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Becky McGowan6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Kristine O'Brien vs Ana Hunsinger / Julie Steven3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Brigid McClaire vs Elizabeth LaBelle / Zhenzhen Yu6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Terri Jenney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Judith McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Brigid McClaire
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Mary Johanson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Philbrook
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.51
Tia Heneghan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Betsy Duryea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Noreyko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Liz Hafer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Johanson + Terri Jenney6166% games+24.3% vs expected
Mary Johanson + Judith McKinney9554% games+8.3% vs expected
Karen Noreyko + Liz Hafer141947% games+1.0% vs expected
Judith McKinney + Terri Jenney12560% games−0.2% vs expected
Kristine O'Brien + Brigid McClaire2840% games−4.9% vs expected
Betsy Duryea + Kristine O'Brien0631% games−16.6% vs expected
Betsy Duryea + Karen Hyde3441% gamesnot enough data
Mary Johanson + Karen Noreyko2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Terri Jenney
110W–65L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Judith McKinney
48W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brigid McClaire
38W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Mary Johanson
37W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Kristen Philbrook
30W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Tia Heneghan
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Betsy Duryea
35W–36L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.43
Karen Hyde
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Noreyko
29W–41L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristine O'Brien
17W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Liz Hafer
24W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.