Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW8.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-06vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Cole / Lisa Ryan vs Shelby Behrmann / Emma Patterson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Agnew / Lynda Rose Purser vs Tracy Quilala / Jennie Parker6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Dean / Heather Orr vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Keiko Ichimaru6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Julie Rowland
published
4.38
Christine Tennant
published 4.5
4.29
Tamra Nelson
published
4.20
Cynthia Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Melissa Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Karen Quidachay
published
3.98
Michelle Agnew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Lisa Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dawn Perkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Stacy Whittingham
published
3.72
Heather Orr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Christina George
published 4
3.61
Laura Garrick
published
3.60
Denise Kimes
published 4
3.60
Teresa Jansson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Lynda Rose Purser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina George + Lisa Ryan5163% games+8.1% vs expected
Heather Orr + Stacy Whittingham123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Garrick + Lynda Rose Purser033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Ryan + Stacy Whittingham303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Quidachay + Stacy Whittingham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Rowland
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Christine Tennant
31W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.38
Tamra Nelson
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Cynthia Dean
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
Melissa Cole
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Karen Quidachay
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Michelle Agnew
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Lisa Ryan
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
4
Dawn Perkins
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Whittingham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Heather Orr
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Christina George
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
Laura Garrick
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Denise Kimes
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.60
Teresa Jansson
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.60
Lynda Rose Purser
12W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Meghan Lewis
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.