Teams

MEMPK VIEIRA

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-06vs LTFCS SHAINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesOlivia O'Hara / Sonia Jumaquio vs Susan Shaink / Karen Schaller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeatriz Arsuaga / Rosa Mccormick vs Sarah Lueckeman / Hannah Geiger3-6, 2-6
2025-08-25vs CSRC SCOTTLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmma Bradford / Teresa Vieira vs Luciana Fecioru / Anne Hiles1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSonia Jumaquio vs Amy Wooten6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJami Cipriani / Rosa Mccormick vs Chana Kolman / Miyo Park0-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs CSCC SEIBERTLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeatriz Arsuaga / Jami Cipriani vs Glenda Coto Meckbel / Becky Cleveland3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSonia Jumaquio vs Kathryn Seibert2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosa Mccormick / Alexandra Dickinson vs Cyndy Hall / Carol Pepper4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-28vs LTFCS SHAINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesJami Cipriani / Alexandra Dickinson vs Myrene Conner / Karen Schaller6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSonia Jumaquio vs Hannah Geiger4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmma Bradford / Olivia O'Hara vs Sarah Lueckeman / Amy Sauerland4-6, 0-6
2025-07-21vs CSRC SCOTTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Dickinson / Beatriz Arsuaga vs Anne Hiles / Luciana Fecioru4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSonia Jumaquio vs Amy Wooten6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Vieira / Olivia O'Hara vs Chana Kolman / Miyo Park1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Alexandra Dickinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Sonia Jumaquio
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.70
Jami Cipriani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Beatriz Arsuaga
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Teresa Vieira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Rosa Mccormick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emma Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Olivia O'Hara
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Dickinson
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sonia Jumaquio
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jami Cipriani
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Beatriz Arsuaga
15W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Teresa Vieira
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Rosa Mccormick
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
Emma Bradford
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia O'Hara
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.