Teams

TYCC Ladies Who Lob - L. Davitt

2021 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesLindsay Davitt vs Catalina Roman6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Lauren Green vs Crystal Shanique Bethel / Susan Frisina6-1, 6-2
2021-04-30vs VDF String Queens - S. CornellWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Molly James vs MARY HESTON / Rosella Nelson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHaley Miller / Lindsay Davitt vs Jessica Bazley / Christy Clinard0-6, 2-6
2021-04-16vs FH Lucky Strings - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Davitt vs Maria Karina Espinoza3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lisa Dreisbach
published 3.5
3.21
Heather Barrow
published 3.5
3.00
Julianne Frost
published 3
2.96
Lauren Green
published
2.95
Lindsay Davitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.87
Margaret Mariani
published 3
2.76
Shannon Roark
published
2.68
Stephanie Rumbley
published
2.38
Susanna Bray
published
2.08
Molly James
published
1.98
Kelley Sadlowski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Dreisbach + Julianne Frost9751% games−6.4% vs expected
Lindsay Davitt + Julianne Frost5349% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Green + Lindsay Davitt314 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Mariani + Stephanie Rumbley224 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Mariani + Julianne Frost303 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Sadlowski + Molly James123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Dreisbach
93W–57L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Heather Barrow
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Julianne Frost
83W–65L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lauren Green
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Lindsay Davitt
87W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Margaret Mariani
73W–69L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
Shannon Roark
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
Stephanie Rumbley
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
Susanna Bray
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
0%82%18%
2.38
Molly James
10W–8L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Kelley Sadlowski
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.