← Teams

RBW-Coe

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

1 players · average NTRP — · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Tim Hanstad
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 0
Results13 ties
2022-06-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTim Hanstad / Steve Lang vs Robert Sidbury / David Marks2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSteve Lang / Tim Hanstad vs Jim Clerget / Jerry Saul6-2, 6-2
2022-06-25Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Hanstad / Steve Lang vs David Roth / Andrew Anderson6-0, 6-2
2022-06-24Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Hanstad / Steve Lang vs Glenn Eisen / Zachary Wright6-3, 6-3
2022-03-26Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesTim Hanstad vs Russel Hercules6-2, 6-2
2022-03-06Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesTim Hanstad vs Christopher Gipson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-27Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesTim Hanstad vs SHREERAJ SUTARIA6-1, 6-3
2022-02-19Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesTim Hanstad vs Justin Bird6-4, 6-3
2022-02-13Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Drollinger / Tim Hanstad vs Roy Higashi / John Hughes6-2, 6-1
2022-01-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Drollinger / Tim Hanstad vs Tawfik Gar-Aouy / Robert Welland7-6, 7-6
2022-01-09Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTim Hanstad / Jeff Wilson vs Joe Morrow / Daniel Warren6-0, 6-0
2021-12-05Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRichard Drollinger / Tim Hanstad vs Don Little / Scott Schlumberger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-12-04Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesTim Hanstad / Richard Drollinger vs Adam Walters / David Marks6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

0
Tim Hanstad
20W–5L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.