Teams

RJ-FEINBERG/JETTON Hot Shots

2025-2026 Racquets & Jackets Tri-Level Doubles · Men Division B (3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-02-22vs RJ-LOOMIS/NMPWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesHarrell Solomon / Sam Yin vs Brad Hamilton / Jeff Reiner7-6, 7-6
2026-02-11vs RJ-KMacVean/BAILEYSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesAlfu Miah / Sriharan Sriniwass vs Zachary Miller / Brandon Lucio6-7, 3-6
W#2 Male DoublesSam Yin / Gaurav Kapoor vs Scott Earnshaw / Jon Theisen6-4, 6-2
2026-02-10vs RJ-LOOMIS/NMPSplit 11
W#2 Male DoublesHarrell Solomon / Sam Yin vs Kevin Loomis / Brad Hamilton6-3, 6-2
L#3 Male DoublesAlfu Miah / Jarrad Miah vs Walter Ortiz / Jeff Reiner6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-12-06vs RJ-LOOMIS/NMPLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesSam Yin / Nathaniel Carter vs Kevin Loomis / David Romley3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men Division B (3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RJ-LOOMIS/NMP7117717169
2RJ-FEINBERG/JETTON Hot Shots3591532236
3RJ-KMacVean/BAILEY26101429197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
SRIVATSAN NARAYANAN
published
3.71
Alfu Miah
usually #3 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Todd Wilkins
published
3.16
Nathaniel Carter
published
3.10
Andrew Howland
published 3.5
3.05
Harrell Solomon
published
3.02
Adam Lidgey
published 3
3.01
Russell Swift
published
2.96
Sam Yin
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Al Solis
published 3
2.58
Adam Feinberg
published 3
Jarrad Miah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Swift + Adam Feinberg1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SRIVATSAN NARAYANAN
51W–40L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alfu Miah
103W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Todd Wilkins
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Nathaniel Carter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Andrew Howland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Harrell Solomon
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Adam Lidgey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Russell Swift
7W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Sam Yin
49W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Al Solis
8W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Adam Feinberg
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jarrad Miah
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.