Teams

Alford - CFAC

2025 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Men · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-17vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Schmidt / Timothy Benning vs Senthil Kumar Seetharaman / Elango Rengasamy2-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTimothy Benning / Hugh Langford vs Sriram Gopalakrishnan / Kevin Martin1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-05-04vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTimothy Benning / Hugh Langford vs Rohit Munjal / Daniel Hong5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-03vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTimothy Benning / Peter Schmidt vs Daniel Hong / Rajakumar Chithambaram7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-19vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHugh Langford / Timothy Benning vs Kevin Martin / Senthil Kumar Seetharaman6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs 4.0SH Who Is We? Net DominatorsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTimothy Benning / Hugh Langford vs Tan Nguyen / Kursat Yavuz6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Tim Alford
published
3.81
Travis Vernon
published
3.76
3.70
Timothy Benning
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Alan Batchelder
published 4
3.65
Mason Clark
published
3.61
Ronald Bartholomaus
published
3.57
Hugh Langford
published 4
3.55
Erich Trier
published 4
3.53
Donnie Kozanecki
published 4
3.44
Paul Diaz
published
3.42
James Stamps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Stamps + Timothy Benning4153% games+10.7% vs expected
Tim Alford + Hugh Langford4344% games−3.7% vs expected
Ronald Bartholomaus + Tim Alford314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Alford
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Travis Vernon
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Eric Prostejovsky
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Timothy Benning
68W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Alan Batchelder
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Mason Clark
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Ronald Bartholomaus
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Hugh Langford
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Erich Trier
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Donnie Kozanecki
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Paul Diaz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
James Stamps
36W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.