Teams

WParker/JAlexander (Queens)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women - Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs JGardiner (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLina Clarke / Maggie Lawrence vs Emma Drake / Susan Jaffe6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesToni Laney / Hannah English Rahill vs Carolyn Drake / Lisa Kane6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBecky Tennyson / Jennifer Watson vs Kristen Montgomery / Jennifer Fayad6-4, 6-1
2023-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Ezzo / Becky Tennyson vs Alison Lacy Sherrill / Cecilia Drake6-2, 6-4
2023-05-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Becky Tennyson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-11vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Tennyson / Jennifer Watson vs Colleen Hickman / Elizabeth Johnston6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Wendy Parker vs Pamela Burks / Elizabeth Strack6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesToni Laney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-04vs JGardiner (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Tennyson / Jennifer Watson vs Jennifer Gardiner / Sharon Gehrig4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Ezzo / Becky Tennyson vs C E Swanson / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek6-2, 6-0
2023-03-14vs KCochran/STo (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Tennyson / Jennifer Watson vs Heather Crysler / Megan Griffin7-6, 6-3
2023-03-07vs MAhern (Palisades CC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Lindsay Morrison3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Abbey Neff
published 5
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.57
4.45
Maggie Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.34
Kim Ezzo
published
4.34
Lina Clarke
published 4.5
4.20
Claudia Vizzini
published 4.5
4.03
Becky Tennyson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.94
Elizabeth McCombs
published 4.5
Kaylyn Thompson
published
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Ezzo + Maggie Lawrence11165% games+9.1% vs expected
Maggie Lawrence + Lina Clarke2450% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Abbey Neff
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
4.84
4.5
Toni Laney
173W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
4.58
5
Hannah English Rahill
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.57
4.5
Maggie Lawrence
153W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kim Ezzo
21W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Lina Clarke
67W–47L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Claudia Vizzini
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Becky Tennyson
120W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Elizabeth McCombs
19W–28L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
Kaylyn Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.