Teams

FV:FVRC 55+:Suttmeier

2022 NCT Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesRob Keppel / David Cappello vs Steve Wargat / Sadiq Hasoon7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Miller / Todd Russell vs Mahmut Tezcan / Greg Plochocki6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLarry Hunt / Melvin Simon vs JOSE DEJUAN / TEJAS SONPAL7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesMelvin Simon / Jacob Schreiber vs Greg Plochocki / JOSE DEJUAN2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRob Keppel / Carlos Badiola vs Steve Wargat / Bill Champagne6-4, 6-4
2022-04-23vs PRC:Pinewoods:Bentley/KnoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlan Nathan / Frederic de Baeck vs Jim Tillow / Kevin Knox6-2, 1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Suttmeier / Todd Russell vs Jack Yeshion / Edward Horne6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarlos Badiola / James Young vs Christopher Bentley / Stephen Young6-1, 6-1
2022-03-26vs PRC:Pinewoods:Bentley/KnoxWon 20
W#1 DoublesRob Keppel / Alan Nathan vs Jim Tillow / Kevin Knox6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelvin Simon / Anthony Riccio vs Jack Yeshion / Cesar Gonzalez6-1, 6-0
2022-02-26vs SIMS:Granger/MerrillWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / James Young vs Lawrence Klobutcher / James Stapleton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Cappello / Rob Keppel vs David Merrill / Jonathan Avery6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeter Suttmeier / Matthew Dallas Gordon vs Gary Granger / Randy Miller6-3, 6-0
2022-02-05vs SIMS:Granger/MerrillWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnthony Riccio / Jacob Schreiber vs Doug Arlow / Jonathan Avery6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Hunt / Stephen Aronson vs James Stapleton / Randy Miller6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Miller / Matthew Dallas Gordon vs Pete Fracasso / David Merrill6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:FVRC 55+:Suttmeier601624102
2EHTC:String Busters 55+:DeJuan/Plochocki328715135
3PRC:Pinewoods:Bentley/Knox2481023175
4SIMS:Granger/Merrill0501530187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Anthony Riccio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Rob Keppel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Larry Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Alan Nathan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Carlos Badiola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Frederic de Baeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Simon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Jacob Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
James Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Stephen Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
David Cappello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Matthew Dallas Gordon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Suttmeier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Russell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Keppel + Anthony Riccio71049% games+7.0% vs expected
Rob Keppel + Larry Hunt8656% games+3.8% vs expected
Melvin Simon + Alan Nathan101051% games+2.6% vs expected
Stephen Aronson + James Young111051% games+0.7% vs expected
Anthony Riccio + Larry Hunt6649% games−0.4% vs expected
Jacob Schreiber + Melvin Simon13851% games−2.1% vs expected
Stephen Aronson + Frederic de Baeck1937% games−8.0% vs expected
James Young + Alan Nathan4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Riccio
66W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Rob Keppel
70W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Larry Hunt
79W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Alan Nathan
45W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Carlos Badiola
67W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Frederic de Baeck
72W–107L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Melvin Simon
67W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jacob Schreiber
52W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
James Young
39W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Stephen Aronson
67W–92L career · 1 line in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
David Cappello
34W–22L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Matthew Dallas Gordon
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Suttmeier
126W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Russell
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.