Teams

3.0 Tocc singles - Wilkerson

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Men 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-22vs Biloxi Bacon-ThamesLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrice Mitchell vs Joe Mitchell4-6, 1-6
2024-12-19vs Matthews/Hewes BBTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrendon Confer vs Gardner Hewes6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Jared Johnson6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJordan Roussel vs Mike Cooper1-6, 1-6
2024-12-17vs OSTC - FriersonWon 30
W#1 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Trey Stennis7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDamon Westfaul vs Mateo Escaner6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBrice Mitchell vs Connor Boleware6-2, 6-3
2024-11-25vs BBTC Beer Nuts KnightWon 20
W#1 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Colin Steenkamp6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLester Mc MacKin vs Barry Regula6-4, 7-6
2024-11-05vs Gautier TennisLost 12
L#1 SinglesDamon Westfaul vs Joseph Mouney6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Drew Bosarge6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJordan Roussel vs Bobby Nguyen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-24vs TOCC - BourcyWon 20
W#1 SinglesLee Gabardi vs John Cleary6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBrice Mitchell vs Brian Brouckaert4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brendon Confer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Damon Westfaul
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Lee Gabardi
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Jordan Roussel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.77
Brice Mitchell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Adam Wilkerson
published 3
Lester Mc MacKin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brice Mitchell + Adam Wilkerson2349% gamesnot enough data
Adam Wilkerson + Lee Gabardi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brendon Confer
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Damon Westfaul
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Lee Gabardi
33W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jordan Roussel
20W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brice Mitchell
30W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Adam Wilkerson
21W–38L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Lester Mc MacKin
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.