Teams

MTurturro (OPRC)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-30vs SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesEileen Jones / Mary Turturro vs Jeri Zangmeister / Jurga Petrikis6-4, 6-3
2024-04-23vs LHatfield/AShook-Maier (Palisades)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Quattlebaum / Stacey Valitchka vs Jane Moncayo / Karen Davies0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Turturro / Cherylyn Henry vs Laura Hatfield / Annie Shook-Maier3-6, 2-6
2024-04-19vs PReimann/KLucas (Matthews)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesStacey Valitchka vs Sharon Sullivan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Day / Mary Turturro vs Peggy Reimann / Lisa Morgan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-19vs SChandler (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Hall / Stacey Valitchka vs Suzanne Austin / Tricia Shaw3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Turturro / Janet Newton vs Adriana Hall / Angela Thomas6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Jones / Mary Turturro vs Margaret Hiller / Lauren Olson1-6, 1-6
2024-03-05vs JAckerlund (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Turturro / Stacey Valitchka vs Scarlett Cochran / Tania Inga6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Lori Quattlebaum
published
2.65
LORRAINE TOMLIN
published
2.64
Kristen Day
published
2.63
Eileen Jones
published
2.57
Stacey Valitchka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Mary Turturro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Annabet Smith
published 2.5
2.21
Lisa Bottle
published
2.19
Cherylyn Henry
published 2.5
Janet Newton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Turturro + Stacey Valitchka123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Quattlebaum
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.87
LORRAINE TOMLIN
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Kristen Day
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%16%84%
2.64
Eileen Jones
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Stacey Valitchka
22W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Mary Turturro
43W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Annabet Smith
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
Lisa Bottle
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Cherylyn Henry
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Janet Newton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.