Teams

LA - Wonderwomen

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShizuko Takayasu / Sandra Nervig vs Anita Liu / Tomoko Pizzo4-6, 1-6
2022-02-26vs LA - T-BirdsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJady Vonderlieth / Shizuko Takayasu vs Claudia Ibarra / Xiaochun Wang2-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs LA - NETwork StarsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Nervig / Shizuko Takayasu vs Annette Alling / Ingrid Flintoft3-6, 3-6
2022-02-05vs LA - MountainGateLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoyce Rosenbaum / Audrey Plager vs Jacki Shepherd / Karen Bruckner3-6, 1-6
2022-01-22vs LA-LLW-Serves You Right!-Mala LeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesShizuko Takayasu / Sandra Nervig vs Mary Foland / Ahdeyh Soltani7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Audrey Plager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Shizuko Takayasu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Heidi Gibbs
published 3.5
3.17
Susan Dalton
published
3.13
Linda Stone
published
3.13
Karen Barry
published
2.83
Lori Tenan
published
2.82
Jady Vonderlieth
published 3
Karin Chafetz
published
Linda Layton
published
Sandra Nervig
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Plager
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Shizuko Takayasu
129W–141L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Heidi Gibbs
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Dalton
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Linda Stone
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Karen Barry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Lori Tenan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Jady Vonderlieth
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Karin Chafetz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Layton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Nervig
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.