Teams

HCC Rip and Sip - H. Dinh

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Melissa Voelker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-13vs Hunters Green Machine - E. HajekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Melissa Voelker vs John Slatniske / Xue Chan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChi Ming Yu / Nelci Rodrigues vs Sean Friday / Ann Coston6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesBryant Moore / Nelci Rodrigues vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Melissa Voelker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-23vs Grand Hampton - M. HartlineLost 01
L#2 DoublesDustin Applebaum / Nelci Rodrigues vs Alys Klouse / Al Nunez3-6, 4-6
2021-05-02vs Tampa Palms No Names - M. AdamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Voelker / David Voelker vs Michael Howe / Marla Adams6-4, 7-6
2021-04-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Chi Ming Yu vs Paul Williams / Naomi Bailey6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-04-11vs Cheval Aces and Sevens - N. MartinezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Voelker / Melissa Voelker vs Adam Crane / Angela Huber6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDustin Applebaum / Nelci Rodrigues vs Matthew Hayes / Rebecca Magner4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Armagost
published 4
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.67
Bryant Moore
published 4
3.65
David Voelker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Michelle Meyer
published
3.60
Dustin Applebaum
published 3.5
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.37
Jane Maxwell
published 3.5
3.37
Nelci Rodrigues
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Voelker + Nelci Rodrigues314 matchesnot enough data
David Voelker + Melissa Voelker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Bryant Moore
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle Meyer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%22%78%
3.60
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jane Maxwell
114W–96L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Nelci Rodrigues
201W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.